Defined benefit pension plan distribution decisions by public sector employees
نویسندگان
چکیده
a r t i c l e i n f o Studies examining pension distribution choices have found that the tendency of private-sector workers is to select lump sum distributions instead of life annuities resulting in leakage of retirement savings. In the public sector, defined benefit pensions usually offer lump sum distributions equal to employee contributions, not the present value of the annuity. Thus, for terminating employees that are younger or have shorter tenures, the lump sum distribution amount may exceed the present value of the annuity. We discuss the factors that may influence the choice to withdraw funds or not in this environment. Using administrative data from the North Carolina state and local government retirement systems, we find that over two-thirds of public sector workers under age 50 separating prior to retirement from public plans in North Carolina left their accounts open and did not request a cash distribution from the pension system within one year of separation. Furthermore , the evidence suggests many separating workers, particularly those with short tenure, may be forgoing substantial monetary benefits due to lack of knowledge, understanding, or accessibility of benefits. We find no evidence of a bias toward cash distributions for public employees in North Carolina. Each year, millions of American workers leave their jobs prior to retirement either by choice or due to termination by their employers. Many of these job changers participate in defined benefit pension plans. On leaving their employers, these workers are often given a choice of keeping their retirement accounts open, thus maintaining a claim on a future life annuity, or accepting an immediate lump sum distribution (LS) of their pension assets. This decision is distinct from that faced upon retirement, since workers maintaining their account will not receive any cash benefits until reaching retirement age. Workers who accept the LS are then given a choice of whether they want to roll the funds over into an IRA or to accept the cash as taxable income and also pay a tax penalty for early withdrawal if under age 59.5. These choices can have significant long run implications for future retirement income and shed light on the magnitude of leakages from retirement saving. In a report describing sources of leakage of workers' retirement savings from 401(k) plans, the Government Accountability Office (2009) concluded that cashing out benefits at job separation represents the principle form of leakage of retirement …
منابع مشابه
Pension sponsorship and participation: trends and policy issues.
Employment sector and employer size account for substantial variation in workers' participation in employer-sponsored retirement plans. Other things being equal, employees in the public sector--that is, federal, state, and local governments--are much more likely to be offered a retirement plan than workers in the private sector. Within the private sector, workers in firms with 100 or more emplo...
متن کاملDefined Contribution Plans, Defined Benefit Plans, and the Accumulation of Retirement Wealth.
The private pension structure in the United States, once dominated by defined benefit (DB) plans, is currently divided between defined contribution (DC) and DB plans. Wealth accumulation in DC plans depends on the participant's contribution behavior and on financial market returns, while accumulation in DB plans is sensitive to a participant's labor market experience and to plan parameters. Thi...
متن کاملInflation Hedging in Defined Contribution Pension plan by Investing in Tehran Stock-Exchange
Due to pension fund problems in Iran, the multi-pillar social insurance system has been released in 2017. According to this, the first pillar is regarding to low income groups and finance through the public fund. The second pillar is defined benefit and finance pay as you go. The third pillar is defined contribution and fully funded finance. Contributions are transferred to the individual accou...
متن کاملShould Corporate Pension Funds Invest in Risky Assets?
Whether defined-benefit corporate pension plans should invest in risky assets has always been subject to debate, and the risky pension asset allocation frequently causes concerns. In this study, we model corporate pension decisions in a setting where a firm balances its risk management concern with employees’ preference for systematic risk exposure. For a reasonable set of parameter values, the...
متن کاملBehavioral economics perspectives on public sector pension plans.
We describe the pension plan features of the states and the largest cities and counties in the U.S. Unlike in the private sector, defined benefit (DB) pensions are still the norm in the public sector. However, a few jurisdictions have shifted toward defined contribution (DC) plans as their primary savings plan, and fiscal pressures are likely to generate more movement in this direction. Holding...
متن کامل